Friday, May 24, 2013

SAN JUAN, Puerto Rico (AP) — Legislators in Puerto Rico have approved a bill that outlaws employment discrimination based on gender or sexual orientation. Opponents of the bill prayed on the steps of the seaside Capitol building on Friday...

Senate Panel to Review Plebiscite 

1 Share
The U.S. Senate committee responsible for the status of the U.S.’ territories will hold a hearing June 11th on Puerto Rico’s political status plebiscite last November.
The hearing will focus on the Obama Administration’s response to the plebiscite as well as on the vote itself.
Energy and Natural Resources Committee Chairman Ron Wyden (D-Oregon) has invited a White House representative and the heads of Puerto Rico’s three political parties to testify. The party leaders are Governor Alejandro Garcia Padilla of the “commonwealth” party, Resident Commissioner in the U.S. Pedro Pierluisi of the statehood party, and former Senator Ruben Berrios of the Independence Party.
A spokesperson for the option of nationhood in a free (non-binding) association with the U.S., which obtained a third of the vote in the plebiscite, has not yet been invited.
Although Puerto Rico is often popularly — but misleadingly — called a “commonwealth”, it is actually a territory of the U.S., according to all three branches of the Federal government. The “commonwealth” party contends that it is not. So, it also does not appear that there will be an advocate for   the islands’ current status, which got 46% of the vote in the plebiscite, in the hearing.
The “commonwealth” party advocates an unprecedented governing arrangement for the islands that Federal officials say is impossible. It would be permanently binding on the U.S. and give the insular government an additional subsidy and power to veto the application of Federal laws and court jurisdiction and to enter into international agreements and organizations as if Puerto Rico were a sovereign nation.  At the same time it would  continuing the grant of citizenship to individuals born in Puerto Rico and current Federal assistance to Puerto Ricans.
A spokesman for President Obama said that the plebiscite demonstrated that Puerto Ricans want to resolve the question of the territory’s ultimate status, a majority of the vote was for statehood as the alternative to the current status, and the Obama Administration would work with Congress on the issue.
The Obama Administration has also responded to the plebiscite by proposing legislation for another plebiscite. Under the U.S. Justice Department proposal, the Federal government would provide $2.5 million for a vote on options proposed by Puerto Rico’s Elections Commission found by the U.S. attorney general to not conflict with the Constitution, laws, and policies of the U.S.
This would exclude the “commonwealth” party’s non-territory definition of the current status as well as its proposed new “commonwealth status.”
The Obama Administration proposed an additional plebiscite to confirm last November’s self-determination decisions of Puerto Ricans because Gov. Garcia and the Puerto Rico legislative majority narrowly elected to office at the time of last November’s plebiscite dispute the vote.
The White House feared that this would prevent action in Congress on the plebiscite. It reasoned that a plebiscite under Federal auspices could not be disputed with any credibility by ‘commonwealthers.’
The plebiscite rejected Puerto Rico’s current status by 54% and chose statehood as the alternative by 61.2%.
The Governor and ‘commonwealthers’ in the legislature contend that the status option for which they urged votes, the current status, was rejected by 51.7% instead of 54%, and that statehood won 44.4% of the vote instead of 61.2%.
The plebiscite results were determined by the Puerto Rico Elections Commission with the support of its “commonwealth” party representative. But Garcia and his legislature allies argue that Commission should have included ‘votes’ not cast in the percentage results contrary to the law for the plebiscite, Puerto Rico election law, and general election practice.
Res. Comm. Pierluisi, who serves in the U.S. House of Representatives, where he can only vote in committees of which he is a member, and 49 other House members have sponsored a bill that also recognizes the results of the plebiscite. It would require the president to submit legislation to enable Puerto Rico to become a State after a phase in of equal treatment in Federal tax and program laws. Puerto Ricans confirming their desire for statehood in a referendum would trigger the submission. The bill would also commit the Congress to pass statehood transition legislation.
The Senate Committee’s House counterpart has also said that it will hold a hearing on the plebiscite but no plans for the hearing are known yet.

Read the whole story
 
· · ·

PR economy shrinks for fourth month

1 Share

PR economy shrinks for fourth month

Puerto Rico’s economy contracted for a fourth straight month, shrinking by 3.1% ...

Hurricane center: Beware of storm surge

MIAMI — During a hurricane, storm surge is one of the greatest threats to life a ...

Why worry? Less stimulus by Fed would point to recovery

WASHINGTON — Investors have grown nervous that the Federal Reserve will scale ba ...

This post has been generated by Page2RSS
Read the whole story
 
· · ·

Puerto Rico's Colonial Status and the US Invasion - Center for Research on Globalization

1 Share

Puerto Rico's Colonial Status and the US Invasion
Center for Research on Globalization
Puerto Rico was a Colony of the Spanish Empire for more than 400 years. After the Spanish-American War of 1898 instigated by the 'Remember the Maine' incident, the United States declared Puerto Rico, Hawaii, the Philippines and Guam as its territories.
Association for Puerto Rico GIS ProfessionalsHydro International

all 2 news articles »

Puerto Rico approves anti-discrimination bill - NECN

1 Share

Puerto Rico approves anti-discrimination bill
NECN
SAN JUAN, Puerto Rico (AP) — Legislators in Puerto Rico have approved a bill that outlaws employment discrimination based on gender or sexual orientation. Opponents of the bill prayed on the steps of the seaside Capitol building on Friday as lawmakers ...

Enfilan cañones a legisladores del PNP para que voten a favor del 238… 

1 Share
activistas_derecho_gay_noticelPor Manuel Ernesto Rivera
Noticel
La actriz Johanna Rosaly, quien dijo en rueda de prensa que tiene un hijo homosexual y un hermano, fue recibida por la portavoz de la delegación novoprogresistaa, Jenniffer González, y allí le reclamó que ejerciera su liderato para que los azules voten a favor de la equidad.
Previo a reunirse con González, la única PNP que votará a favor del 238, Rosaly dijo a NotiCel que es hora ya de que se respete la humanidad de los homosexuales y lesbianas.
“Les voy a reclamar que es justicia y que es estar del lado correcto de la historia. Ya logramos la igualdad de las personas de la raza negra, ya las mujeres han alcanzado posiciones cimeras y hoy tenemos que lograr que las personas con una esencia lésbica, homosexual, bisexual, transexual y transgénico logren los mismos derechos que tenemos los heterosexuales”, sostuvo la actriz en entrevista con este diario digital.
Otra que tronó contra los novoprogresistas fue Alicia Burgos, una estadista que ha trabajado en el Capitolio, reclamó a los legisladores del PNP que voten a favor del 238. Destacó que el discrimen es obvio y las redes sociales dan cuenta de eso. Reclamó que crió a sus hijos en un hogar heterosexual de valores y defendió a su hijo Pedro Julio Serrano con uñas y dientes.
“Nosotros hemos pasado mucho y espero que no tengamos que seguir pasando por esto. Pedro Julio escogió su lucha y nosotros la escogimos con él. Yo trabajé en el Capitolio, yo conozco muchos de esos legisladores, esos legisladores me conocen a mí, conocen a mis hijos, conocen como yo los crié y mi esposo, en un hogar de mamá y papá. Y porque Pedro Julio ame a otro hombre no deja de ser un ser humano, no deja de ser mi hijo, el amigo de Uka, el hermano de Héctor”, indicó Burgos en una rueda de prensa conjunta.
“No vengan a decir que no hay discrimen. Hay discrimen, se necesita equidad para todos”, apuntó.
Indicó que lo menos que le han dicho por las redes sociales es que ella y su esposo necesitan ir a siquiatría.
“Les quiero decir que estamos bien sanos, nuestra mente está clara y nuestro amor es constante”, destacó la madre del activista gay.
Héctor, padre de Serrano, cuestionó el reclamo de igualdad que los novoprogresistas exigen en el gobierno estadounidense cuando aquí son incapaces de estar a favor de la igualdad de derechos para todos los seres humanos.
“Si usted no puede darle la igualdad, no puede darla la suprema condición de hombre y mujer a los que residen en Puerto Rico, usted no tiene la fuerza moral para ir a pararse frente a los portones de Casa Blanca y exigir la igualdad. No tiene esa moral”, dijo el padre de Serrano.
Criticó que ahora no estén a favor del 238 cuando en el pasado favorecieron el 1725. Reclamó que “le hagan honor a todos esos votos que dieron en aquel momento y que por razones puramente político partidistas no se lo están dando el día de hoy”.
“Este no es momento de hacer política, este es momento de hacer patria”, sostuvo.
La publicista Uka Green también reclamó la aprobación de la legislación que ya pasó el cedazo del Senado.
“El que la comunidad LGBTT tenga que estar reclamando sus derechos demuestra lo mal que estamos como sociedad. Esos derechos deben estar dados”, sostuvo Green.
El líder comunitario Papo Christian presentó los proyectos 1725 y 238 y aseguró que no son distintos, por lo que se unió al reclamo grupal para que se de paso a la igualdad.
Burgos cuestionó qué van a hacer los legisladores estadistas si en junio el Tribunal Supremo de los Estados Unidos declara inconstitucional que no se permita a las parejas del mismo sexo contraer matrimonio.
“¿Qué van a hacer? Se van a eñangotar. Yo ceo en la estadidad, yo creo en esa Constitución (de EEUU), yo creo en la democracia, yo creo en los derechos y yo entendía que ellos también creían lo mismo que yo”, cuestionó la madre de Serrano.
“Es hipocresía y politiquería… el que quiere buscar excusas las busca donde quiera. Para mí es inexplicable por qué si votaron anteriormente, por qué no votan ahora. ¿Por qué? Porque ahora está el Partido Popular. Realmente no entiendo”, sentenció Burgos.

 
Read the whole story
 
· · · ·

La cultura, puente al desarrollo socioeconómico

1 Share

La cultura, puente al desarrollo socioeconómico

María Elba Torres Muñoz (Profesora universitaria de la UPR)
El principal patrimonio de la humanidad son sus culturas. Las culturas tienen una infinita capacidad para tender puentes, integrar memorias, crear identidades compartidas, inve

Un papel, cinco pulgadas, 20 segundos y un dedo mojado

Edward Falto (Pastor y profesor universitario)
A varios meses de haber iniciado el nuevo cuatrienio, con un nuevo gobierno, los puertorriqueños se estarán preguntando: ¿qué rayos hicimos en noviembre? Votamos por un cambio

Hace tres años que trabajo en la Escuela Segundo Ruiz Belvis de Mayagüez y no puedo quedarme de brazos cruzados viendo diferentes situaciones que afectan a los estudiantes y maestros. Así como los niños en la navidad le hacen una carta a Santa Claus y a los Tres Reyes Magos, así mismo hago esta cartita con mis peticiones para el próximo año escolar.

Puerto Rico Report: Senate Panel to Review Plebiscite

Puerto Rico Report
Senate Panel to Review Plebiscite
The U.S. Senate committee responsible for the status of the U.S.’ territories will hold a hearing June 11th on Puerto Rico’s political status plebiscite last November.
The hearing will focus on the Obama Administration’s response to the plebiscite as well as on the vote itself.
Energy and Natural Resources Committee Chairman Ron Wyden (D-Oregon) has invited a White House representative and the heads of Puerto Rico’s three political parties to testify. The party leaders are Governor Alejandro Garcia Padilla of the “commonwealth” party, Resident Commissioner in the U.S. Pedro Pierluisi of the statehood party, and former Senator Ruben Berrios of the Independence Party.
A spokesperson for the option of nationhood in a free (non-binding) association with the U.S., which obtained a third of the vote in the plebiscite, has not yet been invited.
Although Puerto Rico is often popularly — but misleadingly — called a “commonwealth”, it is actually a territory of the U.S., according to all three branches of the Federal government. The “commonwealth” party contends that it is not. So, it also does not appear that there will be an advocate for   the islands’ current status, which got 46% of the vote in the plebiscite, in the hearing.
The “commonwealth” party advocates an unprecedented governing arrangement for the islands that Federal officials say is impossible. It would be permanently binding on the U.S. and give the insular government an additional subsidy and power to veto the application of Federal laws and court jurisdiction and to enter into international agreements and organizations as if Puerto Rico were a sovereign nation.  At the same time it would  continuing the grant of citizenship to individuals born in Puerto Rico and current Federal assistance to Puerto Ricans.
A spokesman for President Obama said that the plebiscite demonstrated that Puerto Ricans want to resolve the question of the territory’s ultimate status, a majority of the vote was for statehood as the alternative to the current status, and the Obama Administration would work with Congress on the issue.
The Obama Administration has also responded to the plebiscite by proposing legislation for another plebiscite. Under the U.S. Justice Department proposal, the Federal government would provide $2.5 million for a vote on options proposed by Puerto Rico’s Elections Commission found by the U.S. attorney general to not conflict with the Constitution, laws, and policies of the U.S.
This would exclude the “commonwealth” party’s non-territory definition of the current status as well as its proposed new “commonwealth status.”
The Obama Administration proposed an additional plebiscite to confirm last November’s self-determination decisions of Puerto Ricans because Gov. Garcia and the Puerto Rico legislative majority narrowly elected to office at the time of last November’s plebiscite dispute the vote.
The White House feared that this would prevent action in Congress on the plebiscite. It reasoned that a plebiscite under Federal auspices could not be disputed with any credibility by ‘commonwealthers.’
The plebiscite rejected Puerto Rico’s current status by 54% and chose statehood as the alternative by 61.2%.
The Governor and ‘commonwealthers’ in the legislature contend that the status option for which they urged votes, the current status, was rejected by 51.7% instead of 54%, and that statehood won 44.4% of the vote instead of 61.2%.
The plebiscite results were determined by the Puerto Rico Elections Commission with the support of its “commonwealth” party representative. But Garcia and his legislature allies argue that Commission should have included ‘votes’ not cast in the percentage results contrary to the law for the plebiscite, Puerto Rico election law, and general election practice.
Res. Comm. Pierluisi, who serves in the U.S. House of Representatives, where he can only vote in committees of which he is a member, and 49 other House members have sponsored a bill that also recognizes the results of the plebiscite. It would require the president to submit legislation to enable Puerto Rico to become a State after a phase in of equal treatment in Federal tax and program laws. Puerto Ricans confirming their desire for statehood in a referendum would trigger the submission. The bill would also commit the Congress to pass statehood transition legislation.
The Senate Committee’s House counterpart has also said that it will hold a hearing on the plebiscite but no plans for the hearing are known yet.

Enfilan cañones a legisladores del PNP para que voten a favor del 238… by Pedro Julio Serrano Friday May 24th, 2013 at 1:09 PM

Enfilan cañones a legisladores del PNP para que voten a favor del 238… 

1 Share
activistas_derecho_gay_noticelPor Manuel Ernesto Rivera
Noticel
La actriz Johanna Rosaly, quien dijo en rueda de prensa que tiene un hijo homosexual y un hermano, fue recibida por la portavoz de la delegación novoprogresistaa, Jenniffer González, y allí le reclamó que ejerciera su liderato para que los azules voten a favor de la equidad.
Previo a reunirse con González, la única PNP que votará a favor del 238, Rosaly dijo a NotiCel que es hora ya de que se respete la humanidad de los homosexuales y lesbianas.
“Les voy a reclamar que es justicia y que es estar del lado correcto de la historia. Ya logramos la igualdad de las personas de la raza negra, ya las mujeres han alcanzado posiciones cimeras y hoy tenemos que lograr que las personas con una esencia lésbica, homosexual, bisexual, transexual y transgénico logren los mismos derechos que tenemos los heterosexuales”, sostuvo la actriz en entrevista con este diario digital.
Otra que tronó contra los novoprogresistas fue Alicia Burgos, una estadista que ha trabajado en el Capitolio, reclamó a los legisladores del PNP que voten a favor del 238. Destacó que el discrimen es obvio y las redes sociales dan cuenta de eso. Reclamó que crió a sus hijos en un hogar heterosexual de valores y defendió a su hijo Pedro Julio Serrano con uñas y dientes.
“Nosotros hemos pasado mucho y espero que no tengamos que seguir pasando por esto. Pedro Julio escogió su lucha y nosotros la escogimos con él. Yo trabajé en el Capitolio, yo conozco muchos de esos legisladores, esos legisladores me conocen a mí, conocen a mis hijos, conocen como yo los crié y mi esposo, en un hogar de mamá y papá. Y porque Pedro Julio ame a otro hombre no deja de ser un ser humano, no deja de ser mi hijo, el amigo de Uka, el hermano de Héctor”, indicó Burgos en una rueda de prensa conjunta.
“No vengan a decir que no hay discrimen. Hay discrimen, se necesita equidad para todos”, apuntó.
Indicó que lo menos que le han dicho por las redes sociales es que ella y su esposo necesitan ir a siquiatría.
“Les quiero decir que estamos bien sanos, nuestra mente está clara y nuestro amor es constante”, destacó la madre del activista gay.
Héctor, padre de Serrano, cuestionó el reclamo de igualdad que los novoprogresistas exigen en el gobierno estadounidense cuando aquí son incapaces de estar a favor de la igualdad de derechos para todos los seres humanos.
“Si usted no puede darle la igualdad, no puede darla la suprema condición de hombre y mujer a los que residen en Puerto Rico, usted no tiene la fuerza moral para ir a pararse frente a los portones de Casa Blanca y exigir la igualdad. No tiene esa moral”, dijo el padre de Serrano.
Criticó que ahora no estén a favor del 238 cuando en el pasado favorecieron el 1725. Reclamó que “le hagan honor a todos esos votos que dieron en aquel momento y que por razones puramente político partidistas no se lo están dando el día de hoy”.
“Este no es momento de hacer política, este es momento de hacer patria”, sostuvo.
La publicista Uka Green también reclamó la aprobación de la legislación que ya pasó el cedazo del Senado.
“El que la comunidad LGBTT tenga que estar reclamando sus derechos demuestra lo mal que estamos como sociedad. Esos derechos deben estar dados”, sostuvo Green.
El líder comunitario Papo Christian presentó los proyectos 1725 y 238 y aseguró que no son distintos, por lo que se unió al reclamo grupal para que se de paso a la igualdad.
Burgos cuestionó qué van a hacer los legisladores estadistas si en junio el Tribunal Supremo de los Estados Unidos declara inconstitucional que no se permita a las parejas del mismo sexo contraer matrimonio.
“¿Qué van a hacer? Se van a eñangotar. Yo ceo en la estadidad, yo creo en esa Constitución (de EEUU), yo creo en la democracia, yo creo en los derechos y yo entendía que ellos también creían lo mismo que yo”, cuestionó la madre de Serrano.
“Es hipocresía y politiquería… el que quiere buscar excusas las busca donde quiera. Para mí es inexplicable por qué si votaron anteriormente, por qué no votan ahora. ¿Por qué? Porque ahora está el Partido Popular. Realmente no entiendo”, sentenció Burgos.

 

Mike Nova comments: Bravo, guys! Now, this is really a job very well done, with all these useful and beneficial amendments, from the points of view of both legal clarity and moral courage and fairness. Limitation in scope is also legally needed as a clarifying point, which separates it from other issues, equally important, but not as urgent now. Congratulations to all! - The project 238 was approved, with amendments to Senate version

The  project 238 was approved, with amendments to Senate version.





The gay rights advocate attended views today.(Gerald.lopez @ gfrmedia.com) 

In what is a historic vote, the House passed Friday in final voting by list, the two projects that prohibit discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity.
After a lively debate and the Chamber bleachers filled with people for and against the two projects, they were loudly approved first.
Later in the voting both House Bill 488, and Senate Bill 238, received 29 votes in favor and 22 against.
The popular representative Nardem Jaime, voted in favor of Senate Bill 238, which prohibits employment discrimination based on sexual orientation, but voted against the House bill 488, which extends the protection of Act 54 of domestic violence, to all kinds of couples. The NPP representative, Jose Luis "Nuno" Lopez, voted to reverse Jaime.
The rest of the New Progressive Party delegation, with the exception of his spokesman Jenniffer Gonzalez, voted against both projects.
The House also approved, with the minimum margin of 26 votes, the Senate projects that make legislative reform.
Popular Representatives Eduardo Ferrer and Carlos Vargas, voted against these projects.
One of the most excited was the Rights activist for LGBT community, Pedro Julio Serrano, who could not hold back tears at the outcome. Immediately, through social media, as usual, held: "VICTORY: House OKs # Ps238 and # PC488 and recognize lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender as EQUAL". 

Mike Nova comments: Bravo, guys! Now, this is really a job very well done, with all these useful and beneficial amendments, from the points of view of both legal clarity and moral courage and fairness. Limitation in scope is also legally needed as a clarifying point, which separates it from other issues, equally important, but not as urgent now. Congratulations to all! 

Senate Panel to Review Plebiscite - 5/24/2013 - Puerto Rico Report Enmiendas de la Cámara reducen el alcance del proyecto 238 - 5/24/2013 - El Nuevo Día : Política Abre la primera clínica de salud para homosexuales en Paraguay - 5/24/2013 - Primera Hora : Noticias

Open the first gay health clinic in Paraguay

Open the first gay health clinic in Paraguay

By Reuters05/24/2013 | 2:47 pm
  •  
The clinic expects to serve 10,000 people a year, mostly gay. (Archive) 
The clinic, called Kuimbae (man, in Guarani), is the second of its kind in Latin America.

Paraguay inaugurates the first health clinic for homosexuals, an initiative of the organization Paraguayan We are Gay and Latin American Healthcare Foundation (AHF).
"The clinic will offer free testing and treatment for sexually transmitted infections, HIV testing snapshots, medical, vaccines against hepatitis, human papilloma virus or tetanus, among others," he told Efe Sergio Lopez, leader of Us Gay.
The clinic, called Kuimbae (man, in Guarani), is the second of its kind in Latin America and is inspired by the Program "Mens Wellness Center" as part of an ongoing effort to standardize the detection and early treatment of the AIDS virus and sexually transmitted infections.
Lopez explained that although "is focused on men, the clinic will also serve women and transsexuals and will have no cost to users" and will address "sexual health consultations" of patients.
"We decided to install the clinic there are gaps in public health for men," said the leader, who denounced the "difficulty for gays to be treated in the public health system who suffer discrimination, there is a stigma throughout the country. "
Twelve people, including five doctors, will be responsible for the operation of the clinic, which is open Monday to Saturday and hopes to serve about 10,000 people a year, mostly gay. 

House Amendments reduce the project scope 238

House Amendments reduce the project scope 238

The changes needed in several areas that the measure addresses labor relations
 
(Jose.reyes @ gfrmedia.com)
By Antonio R. Gomez / antonio.gomez @ gfrmedia.com
The main amendments introduced by the House of Representatives to the Senate 238 project focuses on reducing the application of this legislation, the removal of references to the Charter of Rights of Young, the Bill of Rights of the XXI Century Puerto Rican Veterans, and amendments to the Civil Rights Act of Puerto Rico.
The changes also required in several areas that the project specifically targets industrial relations.
Cameral version also removes the controversial "Supremacy Clause", and replaces it with a "Interpretation Clause" which expressly provides that the provisions contained in this measure shall prevail in the event of any inconsistency with any other law.
Also added an article of "Scope" which states that "nothing in this act shall take effect on legislation relating to marriage or adoption procedures.
The most important amendments are:
- It removes the entire project references to "any governmental management, public or private" and replaced by "employment, public or private".
- Is added as part of public policy, which "prohibits particular that no employer may suspend, refuse to hire, discharge or in any manner impair or otherwise use in a person by reason of any of the above protected characteristics "(referring to previously stated in the text as part of the public policy of the commonwealth, the rejection of discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity).
- Removes the definition of gender identity and replaces it with "this definition shall be construed as broadly as necessary," Substitution is done wherever it appears that definition.
- Article 3 was removed amending the Bill of Rights of the Youth
- Article 18 was removed to amend the Charter of Rights of the XXI Century Puerto Rican Veterans
- Article 19 was removed amending the Civil Rights Act of Puerto Rico
- Article 20 was removed in turn amending various Articles 1 of Law Number 61 2011 (Protocol Research and Filing Criminal Acts Against the Sexual Harassment and Gender-based Harassment)
- Creation of an Article 18 directs the Office of Training and Consulting in Labour and Human Resource Management (OCALARH) in conjunction with the Department of Labor and Human Resources of Puerto Rico to develop a protocol compliance, education and training on public policy to eradicate discrimination of all kinds including well establishing sexual orientation or gender identity, as defined in this law, and which will be adopted by all government agencies and applied to all employers in the area private, as provided in this law. For the elaboration of the experts will be consulted on the matter for writing and presentation. The OCALARH and the Department of Labor and Human Resources shall have ninety (90) days of the adoption of this law for the development of this protocol.
- Add in the exception of law enforcement to the churches the phrase "(organizations) whose creeds, dogmas or occupational requirements are in clear contradiction with the interests protected by this law."
- Replaces the controversial "Supremacy Clause" and replaces it with a "Interpretation Clause reads. "In case of incompatibility or inconsistency in any provision of another Act expressly rules and issues contained in this Act, the provisions of the latter.
- Addition of an Article 21 entitled "Scope" which reads: Nothing in this act shall take effect on the legislation on marriage or adoption procedures.

Pierluisi calls for greater federal protection in Island

Pierluisi calls for greater federal protection in Island

As part of immigration reform calls for the inclusion of Puerto Rico
 
Pierluisi said that Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands must be included in any border security measure to be considered by Congress. (Archive)
By ELNUEVODIA.COM
WASHINGTON - Resident Commissioner in Washington, Pedro Pierluisi, said today that the measures taken to strengthen the security of U.S. borders, as part of the reform of the immigration laws, it also takes into account Puerto Rico.
"If we try to protect the U.S. border with Mexico without increasing border security in the Caribbean of the United States, only criminal activity would be moving from one border to another," Pierluisi said during a hearing of the Judiciary Committee of the federal lower house, before the legislative recess on the Day of the Fallen in the War.
Pierluisi, who is a member of the committee, said "the U.S. territories in the Caribbean, specifically Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands, have to be included in any border security measure to be considered by the federal Congress."
According Pierluisi with his statement agreed experts who testified before the commission, as David Aguilar, former Acting Commissioner of the Bureau of Customs and U.S. Border Patrol (CBP, in English), Julie Meyers Wood, former Secretary of Security National Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Chris Crane, president of the National Immigration and Customs Enforcement.
The bipartisan group negotiates the bill to reform immigration laws expected to be submitted in June.
The Committee on the Judiciary of the Senate and passed its own legislation, which now goes to the full Senate. 
"We have to improve the immigration system that works for all Americans, help our economy and on our national interest. Puerto Rico has experienced a dramatic increase in the level of violence that is directly related to land use as a transshipment point for illicit drugs destined for U.S. markets.Although there is evidence that the law and order agencies have worked to increase federal operations in the island, the underlying security dynamics remain the same for more than 3.7 million American citizens residing in Puerto Rico, "said Pierluisi in its press release.

Policía investiga más de 100 querellas radicadas contra agentes via Primera Hora : Noticias on 5/24/13

via Primera Hora : Noticias on 5/24/13
Según el documento, provisto por la uniformada, de las 108 querellas, 66 corresponden al mal uso o abuso de autoridad, mientras que 42 son por mal uso o pérdida del arma de reglamento.

Calma en la Fortaleza tras pugna por medidas de la comunidad gay via Primera Hora : Noticias on 5/24/13

via Primera Hora : Noticias on 5/24/13
La agenda oficial del Mandatario, que se circuló a la prensa, no contempla reuniones importantes o relacionadas al proyecto que mantiene divido al PPD.

via El Nuevo Dia : Política on 5/24/13
La Cámara de Representantes discute hoy los proyectos

via Primera Hora : Noticias on 5/24/13
El activista de derechos humano, Pedro Julio Serrano, expresó su optimismo de que las medidas que vindican los derechos de la comunidad Lgbtt se aprueben hoy.